Your cycling fallacy is…
“When cycling facilities are built, people often don’t use them, but cycle on the road anyway”
The response
This can often be true – many cycling facilities around the world are of a poor standard, failing to enable safe, simple, uncomplicated journeys. Some people who choose to cycle anyway will typically avoid poor-quality cycling infrastructure, because their journey would otherwise be slower and more difficult than just riding on the road.
In fact this is an argument for creating high quality cycling infrastructure which people will choose to use: well-designed facilities typically see significant uptake – for example in the UK, the new cycleways in London, or the Bristol-Bath cycleway.
Poor-quality cycling infrastructure is likely to go unused
Photo by David Owen (Copyright, used with permission)
Photo by As Easy as Riding a Bike (Copyright, used with permission)
Further reading
- Gender and used/preferred differences of bicycle routes, parking, intersection signals, and bicycle type: Professional middle class preferences in Hangzhou, China — ScienceDirect
- Why Don't Cyclists Use the Cycle Paths That Are Built for Them? — Huffington Post
- Sharp rise in NY cyclists linked to roll-out of bike lanes — TransportXtra
- National protected bike lane week: the infographic — People for Bikes
- Protected Bike Lane Statistics Archives — People for Bikes
- Cycle Facility of the Month — Warrington Cycle Campaign
- The language of compromise — As Easy as Riding a Bike
- Why don't cyclists use cycle paths? — Motoring.co.uk
Čeština
- Rozvoj cyklistiky ve městech - je možné se v českých podmínkách inspirovat Holandskem ? — Centrum dopravního výzkumu
- Sčítače ukázaly oblibu cyklostezek i efekt rekonstrukce křižovatky Kapitána Jaroše — Prahou na kole
- Proč jsou pražské cyklostezky odsouzeny k ubohosti — Prahou na kole
українська
Are we missing a link to a great article on this subject? Click here to let us know!