Your cycling fallacy is…
“When cycling, you breathe in more air pollution”
The response
This claim does make sense on a superficial level – cycling, even gently for transport, increases your heart rate and your breathing, therefore cycling will cause people to breathe in more of the airborne pollution produced by motor vehicles.
But many studies have shown that the air quality is worse inside motor vehicles. Harmful polluted air builds inside motor vehicles, which means that the people sat inside them breathe more polluted air than people outside them.
Related fallacies
Further reading
- Differences in cyclists and car drivers exposure to air pollution from traffic in the city of Copenhagen — ScienceDirect
- Walking and cycling good for health even in cities with higher levels of air pollution — University of Cambridge (UK)
- Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? — ScienceDirect
- Smoking in cars is banned. But children still inhale toxic fumes in backseats — The Guardian
- Cyclists ‘exposed to less air pollution than drivers’ on busy routes — The Guardian
- Cyclists exposed to the least air pollution on the morning commute — Evening Standard
- Higher air pollution health risk inside car, study finds — Air Quality News
- Air pollution more harmful to children in cars than outside, warns top scientist — The Guardian
- City cyclists: here's how much pollution you're actually inhaling — Vice News
- Is urban cycling worth the risk? — Financial Times
Français
Čeština
українська
- Прогулянки і катання на велосипедах корисні навіть у містах з поганою якістю повітря — Українська правда
Русский
Are we missing a link to a great article on this subject? Click here to let us know!